The sham Trial, Conviction and Sentence of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, by Omotosho J. is illegal null, void and of no effect.
See sections 267 and 349(6)(b) of The Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.
Omotosho J. was in a hurry to convict and sentence Mazi Nnamdi Kanu that he failed to follow the provision of sections 267 and 349 (6)(b) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.
These provisions require that a person charged with an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment shall be represented by a Lawyer. It is the responsibility of the Court in this case Omotosho J. to have assigned Mazi Nnamdi Kanu a Lawyer to represent him.
Particularly in section 349(6)(b), of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, the provides that " a defendant charged with a capital offence or an offence punishable with life imprisonment SHALL not be allowed to represent and defend himself"
Omotosho J. failed to follow this provision of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 by allowing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to represent himself against the spirit of the law, which says that he shall not be allowed to defend himself.
Mazi Nnamdi Kanu under the provision of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act did not have Legal Representation as envisaged by the A.C.J Act 2015.
Mazi Nnamdi Kanu did not have a fair trial and fair hearing as a person charged with an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment.
The sham trial, conviction and sentence by Omotosho J. will be set aside by the Court of Appeal relying on the combined effects of the provisions of Sections 267 and 349(6)(b) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015. Omotosho J. did not follow the Law in discharging his duty as a Judge. The Judgement will collapse on Appeal.
Uche Onyeagucha Esq
Umuagam Obinze
November 23, 2025
0 Comments